Tuesday, April 5, 2011

‘Transforming Mirrors’: Response to David Rokeby’s text

Today I was began reading ‘Transforming Mirrors: Subjectivity and Control in Interactive Media’ by David Rokeby, a recommended reading for my Intro to Interactivity class. Having only read halfway through the 16page paper I have already come across some good definitions and points to do with the origin, method and purpose of interactive works. Following are some quotes I found interesting:

“A technology is interactive to the degree that it reflects the consequences of our action or decision back to us. It follows that an interactive technology is a medium through which we communicate with ourselves…a mirror.” – Rokeby p1

“Interactive art is simply art that involves the participation of the viewer.” “All art can be called interactive in a deep sense if we consider viewing and interpreting a work of art as a kind or participation.” – Itsuo Sakane

“The spectator makes the picture” – Marcel Duchamp

“(The artist) anticipates the participant’s possible reactions and composes different relationships for each alternative.” – Myron Krueger

“The interactive system responds to the interactor, who in turn responds to that response. A feedback system is created in which the implications of an action are multiplied, much as we are reflected into infinity by the two facing mirrors in a barber shop.” – Rokeby p3-4

“The navigable structure can be thought of as an articulation of a space, either real, virtual or conceptual. The artist structures this space with a sort of architecture, and provides a method of navigation.” – Rokeby p4

No comments:

Post a Comment